
Image is public use and comes from Wikimedia Commons (accessible here).
Finally! An art skip that has nothing to do AWCY. I know there have probably been a few others but I'm glad that is different and cool.
Get it?
+1
At the end of this, I had watery eyes. Congratulations, Kalinin, this is a masterpiece that has to get the attention it deserves.
Also:
a distaste for Borges
I find this surprising; he'd probably love this magnificent piece of magical realism. :)
-1 This is beautifully written… Too beautifully written. The sheer lack of Foundation tone in Esquivel's notes is befitting a tale (and a very good tale), but not a scip file.
But what really gets me is the anomaly itself. Why is this a Euclid class, or a scip at all? A small town with a concentration of art is not anomalous (see Marfa, TX or Jerome, AZ or scores of other towns in the US), and there doesn't seem to be any inherent danger to the town present in this anomaly.
My big unanswered question is how the heck did the Foundation even determine the connection between an artful small town in Nebraska and a vagabond artist a hemisphere away? Even with the resources of the Foundation that seems like a stretch to me. Is this worth devoting decades of an agent's career when nothing harmful appears to be coming from this anomaly?
Honestly, I feel like an asshole down voting something this well written, but I just can't get behind this as a scip.
Eh, I'm willing to forgive the different tone here - My headcanon is that clinical tone isn't strictly enforced in-universe, and is really just a product of the Foundation's atmosphere. Agent Esquivel is embedded deep within a completely different culture, so it makes sense it would affect his writing.
As for how it was discovered…
Mr. Izquierdo came to the attention of Foundation assets based in the Buenos Aires Regional Office in 1965, when he was arrested by Uruguay's Interior Police for attempting to smuggle live specimens of the Paraguaian hairy dwarf porcupine into Argentina. This coincided with a file report of an individual in the United States region of Nebraska conducting what was termed a "performance art" demonstration of an extended tango dance routine while his partner pierced him thirty-three times with porcupine quills.
I can't imagine these sorts of porcupine-related incidents being that common, so two happening in the same day would probably raise a few eyebrows.
So, a guy smuggles a rodent into Argentina (a rodent that is already indigenous to Argentina, no less) and this captures the interest of the Foundation? And then they cross-referenced this with an interpretive dance in some farm town several thousands of miles away? Apart from the fact that they both involve porcupines, these two events have nothing to do with each other and are so utterly trivial and uninteresting on their own that I can't possibly fathom how you get a Euclid class from this.
I'd assume that the Foundation would keep tabs on local criminal activity to detect potential anomalies, and when they noticed the denizens of a town performing some really bizarre ritualistic dance routine involving porcupines on the same day that a guy attempted to smuggle a bunch of porcupines (unless I'm mistaken, this doesn't seem like a normal occurrence), they at least suspected something was up. Afterwards they probably conducted a series of mild and controlled tests on the guy to see what the effects on the city were, and only then did they conclude that there was a definite correlation between the two.
It's probably Euclid because there's no telling how the people of the town would react to certain situations. If the guy lead a terrorist attack, would the Foundation have a townful of possibly anomalously augmented people plotting acts of terrorism? If he died, would the entire town fall down dead? It's unpredictable, hence it's Euclid.
And if the whole world is crashing down… fall through space out of mind with me.
Too convoluted for my tastes. It seems like this sort of wild cross referencing would produce millions of false positives a day.
I am glad, however, that everyone else's suspension of disbelief isn't as neurotic as mine and this brilliant writing isn't wasted in them. This one made me go back and read more of Kalinin's work, which has been a good thing.
I wanted to upvote for this mental image alone:
I don't know what I expected next, but it was not for this Lalo to begin howling like a wolf, which he did. It should have been ridiculous, but the fury and the pain in this man's voice, the mourning for his friend buried in a foreign land, it demanded acceptance.
I think I followed all of the Related Artworks, except this one:
6 m tall depiction of the Greek deity Apollo playing the lyre with a sunrise in the background. Painted on the side of a barn belonging to Mr. Grauber's employer
How does this relate to the story? My Greek mythology is pretty rusty.
Fucking fantastic work, Kalinin. Splendid characterization and portrayal of Foundation workers who are not soulless husks. SCP-348 didn't faze me; nor did those ships that the GOC sunk. This skip, though…
+1, man.
And if the whole world is crashing down… fall through space out of mind with me.
This is incredibly long, to the point where it would irritate me or even ruin the piece in a normal article - but the quality of this and the story it tells makes the length well worth it. It feels like I'm reading a novel more than an SCP article, but that is by no means a bad thing in this case. Safe to say this is already one of my favorite articles, +1 and thank you.
First off, +1. You've given us snapshots of this incredibly interesting, quasi-messianic figure who endeavors to make the world around him more interesting. Pablo has minor delusions of grandeur, but seems like the type of person who is aware of those delusions and is therefore immune to the more unpleasant effects of them, like arrogance.
He's an artist in a city where that probably doesn't count for much. I know that when I wrote more often, I'd have an idea in my head that someday I had to have fans, admirers, at least a big audience, but most people will probably never give a crap about my scrawlings. I know that I write for pride, and for approval, and for my implicit knowledge of that approval. Not the most noble of motivations, but it probably drives a lot of us.
What I love about Pablo's situation is that he seems to get joy out of simply inspiring art, and that limited to his surrounding community. But apparently, through no effort of his own, he did have a far-reaching effect on the world, and he died without ever knowing anything about it. And he felt no poorer for it.
tl;dr Your made-up person is very inspiring, and he feels very real, and I'm actually a little jealous of him.
Secondly, I wish there had been more clear connections between Pablo's actions and the "output" in Dotson. I felt like I had to stretch to understand most of the connections, and that a Foundation research team would have to be really looking hard to justify calling many of them connections - the portraits being an obvious exception, of course. Maybe it's just me, and it didn't detract from the story, per se. I think I could have used more cut-and-dry examples of "Yep, that's anomalous," and more early-on, to justify the Foundation's continued interest after the porcupine incident.
Finally, thank you oh so very much for not making Pablo's last words be "Are We Cool Yet?"
I like the general idea, but quite honestly, tl;dr. I wish the "tale-ier" parts had been extracted into their own, separate thing, to leave the body of the article standing on its own. After the second one, and being somewhat at a loss for how the events relate to the art projects in Dotson, I felt like I had the gist and couldn't see a reason for the rest of the article being there. Also, I'm still not a fan of the inter-Foundation publication footnotes. The writing's above reproach, but the structure needs some rethinking.
Also, I'm still not a fan of the inter-Foundation publication footnotes
As one of the original offenders, I'm really starting to wonder what exactly it is you have against the Foundation having internal publications.
It's quite possibly just that it's being used as "smash in a bunch of extra info that would otherwise break tone." Your thing is a rock what extracts people's souls? Have the article explain about prolonged contact deadening emotional responses, then link to a footnote: "See also: 'Soul Removal and Links to Higher Brain Functions: On the Effects of SCP-XXXX". It's a cheat.
Now maybe they aren't all used like that, but I've quickly grown to discount them the moment I see them because they have been. I also think they're being overused quite a lot; I could see one, maybe two in a medium-length article, but some have upwards of five, for crying out loud.