SCP Foundation

After a draft split and a few months of work, it's here. I give thanks to Reverend Fox, RockTeethMothEyes, Pedantique, and Laneous for the crit they have given me (If I missed anyone from the IRC please let me know, and I'm sorry for not including you).

I legit thought this was Metaphysician for a little bit, kudos.

Midwest spring is currently destroying my body, but I'm currently working on an article that will tie up a few ends. So expect that at some point when my lungs aren't being filled with pollen.

made a reading error

which takes place over the span of five years.

Is this intended to have no line breaks?

Fulfill your purpose"

Is this intended to not have a period?

In general I think the piece is describing the shape of a narrative, but the SCP Foundation format doesn't really lend itself to hinting at a narrative; it must actually contain one or be so compelling that it doesnt need one. It has a lot of compelling aspects to this- the letters are a lot more effective than the communication logs or the addendum of the specific effects associated with each paper. However, the conclusion is questionable overall to have led to something satisfying. I think if there was a greater overview into what is necessary towards a very specific effect impressed upon the reader, and then a sharpening of the ending towards this effect, it'll be more effective than what it is now.

Yes.

Took a while, probably because of how stupidly long this is, but it still means alot to me.

This is possibly the most underrated skip I've read.