SCP Foundation

This SCP is a growing trend of Foundation personnel to submit false security breach reports, go into security breach protocols without justification, and to accuse a high ranking Foundation personnel (thinking of calling them Dr. Drak) of being a traitor.

This will lead the Foundation in strange challenges, as they have to adjust breaching procedures to deal with these false alarms, and the matter of a high ranking officer being accused as a traitor. How credible do they treat these bizarre accusations of what is otherwise an outstanding Foundation member?

While implications are made that this is some warning from the future, much is left uncertain. What is their source, and how should the Foundation respond to it?

Let me know your thoughts!

Umm, are you asking us to give you ideas for a story you have already fleshed out somewhat? If so, I would not suggest that. You are the one that thought this idea up, so you have the best understanding of what will work for it.

And if you already have a plan for how the article turns out, say it. This is a forum for fleshing out ideas, and therefore you should be giving out the entire story here. Explain the anomaly (or if it is a tale since it kinda sounds that way), what your plan for the story is, and how everything connects. It honestly just makes the reviewer's lives harder if you don't explain yourself well.