While the final ingredient list was pretty funny, this does not really do anything to elevate itself from the typical "weird company sells weird product, which is pretty much a main stay on the wiki at this point. The favt that this is sweets, beings it even closer to the likes of generic wondertainment products, which doesnt help
SCP-5110 / Discussion
Forum
» Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions
» SCP-5110
This is the discussion related to the wiki page SCP-5110.
After reading this through, I couldnt really attach myself to this concept. Not to get me wrong, this is a solid idea. I actually really like the idea behind it, and the logic is definitely there.*
But at the same time… it feels like theres nothing backing it up (atleast, in my case.) Ignoring the small mistakes (like SCP-5110-C being mentioned in the description of the test logs instead of SCP-5110-B like it should be), a part of me just goes back towards I cant really find a reason to connect with this.
I appreciate how brief it is, but the whole thing feels misplaced. It may be the fact that PURE FOODS feels too convenient or something, I cant tell. The idea is there, but I cant relate with it. It just kinda feels like a spoopy thing, and that's all.
That's my reason behind the -1. But this is still an interesting read!
The list of products might be more interesting as an experiment log rather than simple descriptions of what the items do. Descriptions of a D class having berries blasting out both ends, or realizing days later they are growing a bear.
Don't get me wrong, I like this idea. But if SCP-5110 is the collective term of the objects themselves, wouldn't SCP-5110-A - D be referred to as SCP-5110-1 - 4? This isn't exactly a problem and can be fixed easily, the real problem with the article is the repetition. SCP-5110-C and SCP-5110-D have essentially the same effect. However, I still love the concept and the development of the skip, for now, this is a novote from me.
EDIT: Meh, I don't really care anymore, +1
Numbering and lettering systems are fairly interchangeable and mostly up to the author. They also vary widely in usage — sometimes they're the objects making up the larger phenomenon and sometimes they're just a related anomaly.
[deletion vote paused as article is currently at -8]
I'd be interesting in a rewrite for this page.
Linked from chatroom. I personally thought it was quite good especially for what I assume is the authors first scip I do however.agree with what Auxiphor said above about test logs otherwise I found it amusing and not really -1 worthy gave +1
Out of curiosity, why did you recreate the blockquote instead of using Wikidot's native function? Normal blockquotes adjust their margins based on screen size, but your ingredients list is pushed over awkwardly 40px to the right on mobile.
I wanted to have the calories thing appear in a box as they usually do on the back of products. You can't really have a blockquote inside a blockquote, though.
You actually can — just put two ">" symbols instead of one. Here's Wikidot's explanation of quotes.
I believe you can. You would just have to do, "»"
heres this
this is the blockquote in this blockquote
whoa we're back here now.
Hopefully this helps!
(EDIT: Nagiros beat me by mere seconds to post that. lol)
A solid idea, although a lot can be improved, and I suggest that the designations -A to -D are changed to -1 to -4.
There were a few grammatical errors, including failure to use capital letters, which I have fixed for you. (I have not changed any words, only the capitalization)
Overall, you have a good idea, it just needs a bit of work
+1
I know this doesn't add anything of substance, but this is one of my favorite articles now. Not because it is particularly funny or emotional, but because it got rescued from deletion. I've never seen that happen, and it puts a huge smile on my face.
You will need to fix the misaligned suffixes in the table. On 5110-B, it says -C in the description, in -C it says -D: otherwise it'd be a +1.
+0
/forum/t-13084288/scp-5110#post-
page revision: 7, last edited: 17 Nov 2020 06:16
