Image source: https://archive.defense.gov/News/NewsArticle.aspx?ID=120851 Department of Defense, public domain, modified by me
I have decided to no-votedownvote this piece for two reasons. The first is that certain sections of dialogue don't really line up with each other, examples will be provided below. The second reason is just a line that probably needs to be deleted.
SCP-4751: I'm fine. You know, don't suppose I could convince you to just call me Dario?
Jirati: I understand your concern.
I get that you are going for a robotic feeling here, but these two lines don’t line up because the “I understand your concern,” doesn’t do anything that connects it back to the statement made by the SCP. Like what concern does the doctor understand, the SCP didn’t mention any concern.
SCP-4751: [Pause] Oh, sorry, forgot you can't see me shrugging my shoulders.
Jirati: Very good.
I really enjoyed this first line, it gave us a solid insight into the SCP’s emotions, though the second line needs some more work and fiddling with it as it is allowing an act of defiance and it also is not building off of the other statements. Read outloud your dialogue and see if it feels natural or sounds right, if it does then you’re going down the correct path.
My final critique of this piece is the following line.
The anomaly associated with SCP-4751's person manifested roughly 18 months prior to detainment by Foundation agents.
I suggest that you remove it, as it makes more questions arise when the final twist is revealed. The line doesn’t really add anything to the piece, the most it does is confuse your audience.
If you need more help for the dialogue or anything feel free to PM me and I will be able to get back to ya.
ETA: I have reconsidered my vote on the piece after a second read-through, the reliance on the twist is too much, and because of that I have changed my no-vote to a downvote.
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this review do not reflect the opinions of SCP Wiki staff as a whole. Please respond to
King of the Meese
I personally liked this entry, even if I agree with Alces’ points about the dialogue. I especially found the twist pleasantly surprising :)
This is heavily reliant on its dialogue to make it work, and it doesn’t work. It’s wooden throughout, I think reading them aloud and tweaking as such is a good suggestion.
There are moments where it feels like it could turn and enrich what came before by virtue of taking that next step but that never manifests in the article itself. I agree with Alces’ crit and I might also greatly summarize the description since the article doesn’t really need much more than a paragraph’s worth of information to set up the interview logs.
Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!
Hmm… nah. There's just not enough in here to grab my attention, which is a shame because I feel there could have been. It's an army guy who you can't interact with (reminds me a lot of an X-Files episode), but there isn't enough done with it. For a start, him being military doesn't contribute to the story in any way, you could switch him out for anybody. Then, as people above have already mentioned, the article relies heavily on dialogue, but the dialogue is short, wooden and doesn't add much. The final interview is I guess supposed to add a mystery of if there's a second one, but honestly it's so short it doesn't register.
There's so much unexplored that could have been cool. How did this affect him before he was contained? Was it when he was still in the army? Can you be pushed by him without feeling him? Can you hear him when you shut your eyes? Surely his anomalous trait makes him quite dangerous (again, the X-Files episode)? Why do the Foundation deny him everything? How is being taken away from his life and locked in a bare windowless cell without human contact, except for a cold chat with someone who doesn't care about him once a day, doing for his mental health (he seems just comically irritated)?
So much different ways to go, none of them taken imo. -1