Nice. Pretty good stuff, the language was pretty biblical-sounding. The sole exception is Verse 8, which jumps out as incredibly weak to me, especially for the first two items of the list.
+1.
Nice. Pretty good stuff, the language was pretty biblical-sounding. The sole exception is Verse 8, which jumps out as incredibly weak to me, especially for the first two items of the list.
+1.
I'd say that this article was some really solid work, and I enjoyed the story and the message behind it. It was a little weak regarding tone and language, however.
One of the most enjoyable parts was how it combined narrative, structure, setting, and moral into one piece. It's a very clear lesson on the morals of warfare and the justification of violence, and it neatly calls out the hypocrisy utilized in those cases. It's a clear statement on how forgiveness may come from engaging in certain acts if they are justified and one doesn't gain pleasure from them. The true evil comes from the desire to engage in those actions. If someone has to do something they would normally consider evil for the greater good, then they shouldn't be searching for the opportunity to do those evil things. Many people may claim that their actions are justified, but the fact that they relish the opportunity to engage in them, as the soldier does here, is what makes them evil, regardless of whether or not they can claim justification. In the end, his desire for violence and bloodshed is what caused his fall from grace. It didn't matter that he did it in the name of his King, his atrocities and corruption had become ingrained within him.
I'd say my primary issue with this piece is its execution of biblical tone at times. I think you often mix up "biblical tone" and "flowery language," and while works of scripture are indeed very poetic and flowery, I feel that in some places this article doesn't quite execute the actual biblical tone, and substitutes it with generally descriptive language.
I haven't read much Horizon Initiative stuff, but this has actually piqued my interest regarding them, and I'd actually like to see more GoI formats from them in the future. Well done!
I can swallow pills without water.
This nails the tone it's trying for, which makes for an immensely enjoyable read. Although the subject matter — another 076 backstory, as I take it — is a bit cliche, the tone was great enough to more than make up for it.
can I get some nice "no signatures on my forum"
sigma-9 css machine broke broke
understandable have a nice day
Thank you. I didn't actually write this to be about Abel tho (personally I don't think 076 is strong enough to kill Apophis lol), but I'm all for death of the author so if you want to take it that way you are free to do so
Knowing it's not meant to be Abel only improves the piece in my opinion, and removes that concern.
can I get some nice "no signatures on my forum"
sigma-9 css machine broke broke
understandable have a nice day
Echoing what stormbreath said, you really nailed the biblical tone here: combined with the simple but moralistic story presented here and the diction, this really feels like a kind of story you'd find in a gospel book. This made for a very nice introduction into the Horizon Initiative GoI format for me. Great job with this!
From then on, he would wonder the outer darkness, […]
I believe this should be wander, though do correct me on this if it's a stylistic choice.
Thank you. If you want another good Universal Text I recommend Excerpts Regarding St. Sophia
Yeah, it was a typo. I went ahead and fixed it, so we are good now
I have several issues with the tone here and do not believe the piece sufficiently captures "Biblical language", whatever that is. I'm also not particularly engaged by the morality presented here — that war is evil but necessary so don't enjoy it — nor by the narrative itself. The story's practically done as soon as the king warns him to wash off the blood, since everything else can be extrapolated from that.
The main failing of the warrior was not that he enjoyed battle, not any more than it was the love for his king, but these are the things that lead to his corruption. The moral is more so about "just because your sins are forgiven, does not mean the consequences are erased," although obviously the commentary on war is still there
Yes, the foreshadowing likely did make it quite apparent what was going to happen to him, but given that it's a metaphor for a specific kind of spiritual corruption in this case, what would cause the warrior's spirit to be corrupted beyond just general fighting was hopefully still a mystery up to the reveal, but perhaps I failed on the latter part.
Anyway, thanks for the feedback. Any specific recommendations on how I can improve this sort of tone for the next time I try pieces of this style?
It seems like the boy's sin was that he showed no mercy to his enemies as a result of his love for the king. I'm not sure the themes espoused by the king in paradise match the story being told, and if they do, I thoroughly dislike the king anyways for the whole "child soldier" thing and neglecting to inform him of his eventual damnation despite promises of redemption.
Any specific recommendations on how I can improve this sort of tone for the next time I try pieces of this style?
Unfortunately I'm not a religious scholar. Something's rotten in the state of Denmark but I can't say what exactly. Try to cut down on flowery language and list names when possible (instead of "distant kingdom" and such).
Indeed, that too was a sin, but that's almost more a symptom. And yeah, I do not blame you for disliking the king; his coldness was based some biblical portrayals of God/Jesus, which aren't exactly where God puts forward his more benevolent face lol
I like that phrase lol. Those seem like good ideas, thanks