SCP Foundation

So I made a thread about this SCP project I was working on, but now I made some major changes on it. I'm sick of asking Zyn ,who has been very helpful, to ask someone to critique it wasting mine and his time. So please review it, critique it, share your honest opinion on this project.
It's still far from finished, but I'm stuck and don't know how to continue. Every post matters and means much to me and this project.
The link:
http://scpsandbox2.wikidot.com/deleted:dr-david-brajkovic
Thank you!
Edit: I think the main problem is around the experiment and interview logs so take a look at them the most. If you have an idea of how to change them please tell me, it would really help to improve the project and help me write my first SCP article.

Yo.

A few brief things I picked up:
Remove the "unknown" part from the description, it serves no real purpose into the narrative.

For the description, you really need to use a decent paragraph structure. You've started a new line per sentence, which leaves it all feeling "disjointed".

Addendum XXXX-01 needs a little work with the templates, how you wish to approach this is up to you, but as I've mentioned earlier, leaving gaps and starting new lines, just to give a coordinate for example, doesn't so much draw attention to your story as it breaks flow instead.

Shrink the photo: "The photo found in the instrument's bell" down, I don't know how it looks on your screen, but on mine its interfering with the Experiment Log XXXX-A template and text within.

For when D-15927 speaks in Croatian, for ease of reading, just have the log state [in Croatian] and then type it up in English, the footnotes aren't meant to be used this way, as when you hover over them it always gives a heading, and offers you the choice to click to scroll the page - its distracting and ruins the atmosphere you're trying to build.

There are quite a few test logs that could do with some collapsibles.

The last image: "SCP-XXXX shematic view", I need to point out 'schematic' is spelled wrong, also its shoved right down the article on the footnotes, when it is actually a far better quality and clearer image than the first picture you've chosen, "SCP-XXXX in its storage chamber", I would either swap them, or delete the 1st image altogether.

Keep it up!