SCP Foundation

I can't think of anything not to appreciate about this. Everything is so… terrifying. D:

I am terrified to this day of what happened on that fourth expedition…

I had to turn my light on to finish this.

I wonder what would happen if tried to make physical contact with the face.

This SPC has an almost perfect balance between written description of events and allowing the readers mind to fill in the blanks, on one hand I want to see the forth log, on the other I'm worried it could ruin whatever my mind has constructed about the entry. Overall great SPC.

I must say, I really wish we could see log IV. Dunno if it'll ever happen, but I'm definitely holding out hope.

Rather curious as to what this strange device is… It clearly doesn't know what a camera is and has been trying to find out since Exploration I; A task made significantly more difficult by the holders' inability to keep still. It wants to see the inside, which is why it just stares into the lens…

Either that or it wants people to stop invading its home. Either or, I'd like to see a "Declassified" log of "Exploration IV" . Please?
I'll contribute ideas if need be.

For the child I mean. It seems the only one to be allowed to approach the child was D-9884 in this document. She is also the only who was female. And SCP-087-1 didn't chase her out, but rather, chase her further in. Assuming no other way of communicating, SCP-087-1 was perhaps encouraging D-9884 to approach the child? Else it would have appeared in front of her, rather than behind. So perhaps D-9884 is being 'asked' to help? Or perhaps as food.

Congratulations, I think this is the first supplement to reach +100 votes (if I'm mistaken, please notify). Not entirely sure if the author is still around on the site, but congratulations anyway. By the way, this gave me insomnia, you magnificent bastard.

its eyes are fixed directly on the lens, this time looking not at the subject but the person viewing the video feed.

It is not staring at the subject; rather it is fixated on the camera lens, giving the illusion it is making eye contact with those viewing the footage.

the face comes in full view of the camera, eye contact being made directly with the viewer.

I am sorry¹ but this is a deal breaker for me. This just seems so, so, out of place? So unprofessional? So amateur? "It's staring into the camera, not at the camera, but at the person who is viewing the camera. Locking eye contact with its pupil-less eyes and reading your soul for cookie recipes." It was all fun and creepy until these bits. (well, that and everyone's amazing guesses at the distance of the crying child voice echoing up from a bottomless stairwell) I get that it's a creepy idea, that it's looking through the camera to see you, you who felt so safe sending people down without risk to yourself, but this is trying too hard. With paintings you will often get the feeling that person's eyes are following you. They do not actually follow you, and anyone who gets that feeling should remember that. Staring into the camera, verses staring into the eyes of the person who viewed the recording, how do you even note that? Not like this is all I know.

/bitching