I really like stories that take cutie scp's and just goes nuts with them. An enthusiastic upvote!
Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!
Oh god oh god oh god oh god oh god oh god oh god
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaugh
if your reading this your gay
I told you all someone should make 999 more of a monster
Tanhony is a chill bro, he gets it
It's frikkin adorable. +1
Living the dream, or dreaming the life?
Eh, I dislike this. I mean, why can't something be truly, legitimately nice? This is like the grimdarkification of the never hungry man, and I view that as one of the greatest mistakes ever made on the site.
Once again, couldn't disagree more.
Never hungry man edit is neat, not the least because it points to why we contain things that appear harmless - quite often, we are just missing the whole picture.
But we already have some of that. Why can't there be some things that are legitimately harmless? It would be absurd for there not to be.
Intrinsic hostility is wildly implausible.
We do have plenty of things which aren't harmful at all, and are just odd. Josie, the old AI,the key, all or nothing, abdominal planet, 110% stickers, the invisible cat (it's no different from a tiger, except it doesn't look like one)
Hell, even my Fruit of Man isn't doing anyone any harm.
Plus, a lot of the legitimately harmless ,no abuse whatsoever things end up as Anomalous Objects.
Thing is, not everything that appears harmless is, and Never-hungry man works just so much better with that angle played.
I gotta agree. The hahaha it's actually creepy thing is cheap (and easy). Also unnecessary. There're already plenty of example of cute things that are actually dangerous. And they actually become less creepy with stuff like this.
Well, there is no canon, but I agree. There are tons of SCPs that are nice, but really bad, but not many that are simply nice, like 999. Again, there's no canon and this article is a very well done grimdarkification of 999; as long as the main article doesn't get edited, I'm fine with stuff like this.
I, for one, don't see any "intrinsic hostility" in this piece; it's more a case of it wants to share, or at the least it NEEDS to share, what's going on inside of itself, but it needs to do so carefully or it hurts/kills the people it's "sharing" with. The problem is that it's fundamentally flawed, and what it shares is just silly madness.
It's kinda like if Cthulhu had a mash-up with the campy mid-60's Joker and—- oh dear lord.