(account deleted) 27 Apr 2012 04:09
As a sidenote, you don't really need to redact researcher/doctor names.
Otherwise, neat article.
SCP-1091 / Discussion
Forum
» Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions
» SCP-1091
This is the discussion related to the wiki page SCP-1091.
(account deleted) 27 Apr 2012 04:09
Get rid of that final addendum, it only hurts the article.
Salman, I struggled with including that addendum. But I feel it's necessary to add to the story of the entity. Clearly, it has a goal.
I agree with Salman, it just doesn't add to the article.
it's not adding a story, it's giving it a mystery that isn't resolved - distracting from the main point of the article.
use of a hilariously grungy font on the picture is goofy. Other than that, I like this a lot.
Meh. An entity which travels between radio transmitting devices, which will do something bad when it reaches its destination, with no hint what that something is.
This is all right, but we just had an entity that exists only as a radio broadcast, and I think that article was far more effective. Plus it had Morgan Freeman. That last image is pretty cheesy, too.
This is what I was thinking. But, after rereading the statement from SCP-1965, my head canon immediately determined this could be another instance of that entity, though severely weakened from years of isolation. So, in that regard, I kinda like it.
he was writing this one well before the other was posted. i commented on that in that one's discussion thread as well. he wasnt copying anything, just independently making something that happened to be similar to something someone else made. i agree the other one is better - that doesnt mean i dont think this one is also good and worth having despite that.
/forum/t-464338/scp-1091#post-
page revision: 7, last edited: 17 Nov 2020 06:16
