Okay, here we go. Cleaning up the backlogged stuff in the forums, so this is a quick read. Here are my thoughts:
So, first off, you have a lot of little errors here and there. Keter in the object class needs to be capitalized, you're missing punctuation at the end of the last sentence in containment, if a sentence in parentheses is supposed to be a standalone sentence (and not part of a previous sentence that has already ended with a period) you need to capitalize the first word, and so on. There's also the "aversion phase" which is for some reason not listed with the other phases? There's also a fair number of things in "scare quotes", which generally should be avoided because in-universe, the article is written by an experienced researcher who would know the correct terminology to use without needing to approximate.
So far as the concept goes… ehhh. It comes off as a mix between the generic parasite and generic compulsion, both of which are popular themes in SCP writing because so many people expect the site to be wholly horror-centric. Take a look at the articles tagged with "compulsion". Furthermore, the SCP's effect forcing someone to do something tends to be a bit of a lame narrative, since things are more interesting if there's a struggle involved, and/or if the people instead do terrible things of their own volition. Consider reading through the further discussion on the narrative issues of compulsion and addiction effects.
I'm also getting the feeling that the effects are way, way more complicated than they need to be. When you've got five giant paragraphs that boil down to "it makes you go crazy and do weird stuff, and then it eats you", it makes a reader feel overwhelmed by all the information, most of which kind of comes off as fluff text. I'm also not sure if I believe most of the stuff, mainly because I'm not entirely certain how the Foundation would figure out all those details.
Keep in mind that as the author, you know the entire story, but the Foundation needs to have discovered what it knows about the SCP object through observation and experimentation. You'll need to convince your reader that someone with no prior knowledge whatsoever of the anomaly managed to somehow figure out (not magically know!) all the information you've got in the article.
I recommend getting the base idea polished up in the Ideas and Brainstorming forum before you try fixing the draft. Go to that forum, post a quick summary of the concept you want to write up (don't link the draft unless someone asks), and reviewers there can help you make the idea more interesting and give you some advice on structuring the eventual article for smoothness of reading and narrative.
