Okay, here we go, cleaning up forum backlog, this is a quick read. Here are my thoughts.
I uncollapse everything before I start reading, and in all honesty, the table is messy-looking. Given that some of the cells have a ton of text and other have comparatively much less, it seems unnecessary to have the table setup with all that negative space. Just use a regular quote box and have the results/tests in a normal list. Also, the " marking indicates inches, which are not metric measurements, and I usually see it written as Level-4, not Level 04. Also, pretty much all your footnote content can just be put into the main article body itself.
So far as the concept goes… I feel like it was presented in a far too-complicated way for me to enjoy. I was pretty skeptical of the "An active state is achieved upon SCP-3886 making physical contact with a relative of French-American immigrant and equestrian carnival performer" effect, especially since I have some trouble believing that the Foundation was able to test that with enough rigor to accept that as empirically-supported. My takeaway was that it's a saddle that makes dead animals alive again and also obedient, and freaks out horses for some reason.
Admittedly, I'm not a fan of long articles with lots of logs, so I lost interest in reading after the first document insert. I had a hard time figuring out which parts of the excerpts (not exerpt) had information important for understanding the anomaly and its backstory, and given the sheer quantity of log/supplement material, I felt rather overwhelmed. Maybe consider trimming some of that down? What you have currently seems far more tale than SCP, since the focus of the material seems to be all the stuff that people would consider addenda content.
I dunno about this.
