I've received some feedback that since the mobile task force uses SCP-3688 to help contain other scips, it could be classified as Thaumiel. Would taking all the information after the first incident and restricting it to Level 5 Access, along with a note about how SCP-3688 is reclassified to Thaumiel, work well or should I keep it how it is?
Eh… I'm personally not entirely sure about the Thaumiel classification, given how unpredictable and damage-causing this thing can be, with regards to Incident-3688-2 and all. Plus, people tend to scrutinize Thaumiels rather closely, and if the start of the article doesn't really make it clear how this thing is actually helpful (rather than just any other poorly-understood anomaly) you run the risk of people downvoting before finishing the work.
I took a quick look at this, and while honestly it's not my kind of piece (I prefer shorter, more straightforward articles) I don't remember seeing many grammar/tone/mechanics/formatting errors, so that's good. The stuff you have in collapsibles might not need to be, especially if you trim down the description a bit so you don't lose the audience before they get to the better stuff in the logs.
In all honesty though, I felt this was kind of bland. What I was getting from it is "thing that makes you sleep and also weird dreams". The description feels really draggy for me—why not just have all those paragraphs whittled down to maybe a sentence each, and put the descriptions of the settings 1-5 in a bullet point list? Makes the read a lot smoother and doesn't bog down the piece as much.
I was actually given some weird SCP-3236 vibes because these are sleep pods, and admittedly that made for some strange cognitive dissonance on my part. Also, I don't think I've read SCP-2111 (and if I have, I've forgotten it) so there's that to keep in mind as well.
I dunno. It could just be that this isn't my sort of piece. Have you considered contacting the author of SCP-2111 for some advice?