So, this is… pretty problematic. Not only do you have a lot of small writing issues, like using "it's" when you mean "its" (it's means "it is" or "it has"), misusing the word "administered" in context, stating only the common name of a bug and not the Latin species, unnecessary capitalization of stag beetle, using words in "scare quotes" although in-universe the document should be written by a professional researcher who would know the terminology to use without having to approximate, and so on.
There's also a lot of video-game/D&D infodumping information happening that doesn't quite make sense in its specificity, such as:
SCP- 3905 can run at a top speed of 110 km/h, can jump about 2 meters, and can lift things about 500kg, which it can also throw 5 meters.
Keep in mind that as the author, you know the entire story, but the Foundation needs to have discovered what it knows about the SCP object through observation and experimentation. You'll need to convince your reader that someone with no prior knowledge whatsoever of the anomaly managed to somehow figure out (not magically know!) all the information you've got in the article. Unless the Foundation ran a bunch of tests to determine all these numbers, there's no way for them to be able to state these things (especially not the top speed) for sure.
All that said, this comes off as a generic monster that's dangerous for the sake of being dangerous, and the fact that it seems to prefer humans to eat just feels tacked on (why is it always humans? why not things there are more of in the world, like chickens?). I'm also really tired of seeing the end of the article just be a "okay, people are dead, here are some more numbers" log. It gets old fast.
I say get the idea checked in the Ideas and Brainstorming forum before you try fixing the draft.
