Okay. In all honesty, this is a meh from me. It wouldn't get an up-vote or down-vote and I'm going to explain why.
One: White fire (completely white fire) does actually exist (newborn stars) and we humans are capable of recreating temperatures to draw it out. Though tb fair, if I'm not wrong, only particle accelerators can pull off such a feat.
Secondly, this has to do with the way it's written. It's written like a simple basic report without anything that really pulls you in. I know that on this site writing in pure clinical tone is what is required, however, you also need to pull off an interesting narrative as well. Simply putting white fire that heals burn damage is not going to keep you floating for long
In terms of the concept, separating it from the way its written (which is done great btw in terms of pure tone), I like it. The problem is, right when I was really starting to bite it ended, leaving me to chomp down on my tongue rather than a nice article.
I realize I've gotten a bit confusing at this point but please bear with me.
I think adding test logs and showing how the foundation personnel came to its observations would be much better than just leaving it to the description
Happy writing!
