Ok author… let's see what we have here.
So, I'll be honest the way this is written does not benefit from the use of iterations. You make the reader read through a lot of the same information over and over again, and very little story progresses. If you ever want to run any sort of revisions based article, you'd want to make sure that almost all information presented in each iteration it different, or else it really makes the article drag on.
Moving onto your concept - The idea of a person who, when you look at them, gives you reality bending powers is not super interesting in and of itself, and the way you try to explore the Foundation's interactions with this anomaly don't make much sense, as I would've thought they'd just keep the guy locked in containment instead of continuously trying to strip him of the anomaly (Foundation does not try to neutralize anomalies, just contain them). You briefly mention something about a containment breach attempt, but I could not find any details about said containment breach that justify cutting off the arm.
Overall, I think that this needs to go through another round of brainstorming. Because your original critique was good, but I don't think your attempt to address the critique is working. I hit my "downvote point" more or less during the last description collapsible, and therefore did not read the incident logs. If you have that much build, you're going to need to keep a reader interested by making sure each revision in throughly different from previous versions, and the writing within each version just felt like a very dry cut story of trying to neutralize the anomaly, which, as I noted earlier, felt somewhat out of character for the Foundation.
Full disclosure - I'm finishing up this critique kinda late, so I might comeback and rewrite it to be a little easier to follow and parse, but if you have any questions feel free to ask. I'm pretty active on the IRC so catching me over there is probably the most efficient/effective way to go.
Good Luck!
