This seems to suffer from the same issues as in your previous draft: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-5673492/printed-probability-papers
Also, the references to other articles just seem unnecessary and can overwhelm a reader (especially if they're not familiar with any of the articles you're linking to), the O5 discussion doesn't quite sound in-character for someone who's supposed to be part of the people running the entire Foundation, and the addendum kind of drag on and don't particularly catch my interest as a reader, plus the "Seduction of several people." entry just seems gross to me.
Overall it really feels like it needs to be trimmed-down and better-focused, mainly because there's just so much going on and the article is too disorganized to present the flow of the narrative well. I'm also unsure of how the Foundation managed to obtain all the information about the SCP object to begin with, plus the way things were handled just seems… off. Surely the Foundation isn't so power-hungry or greedy to need a discussion between the O5 and the Ethics Committee to know that they shouldn't use something like this to manipulate reality in unexpected ways, even for a short-term benefit? Why are only 100 instances incinerated? Pretty much the entirety of the "Non-research usage of SCP-3378, by both Foundation staff and non-Foundation staff." addendum can go; it just looks unprofessional and makes it harder to take the article seriously.
I feel like there's something workable here because the idea of an anomaly that flips probability is one that I don't think has been done before, but the way it's presented here doesn't do the concept justice.
Did you ever get the concept checked in the Ideas and Brainstorming forum before starting the draft?
