SCP Foundation

This was a bit of a long time in the drafting process. Hopefully this works.

Thanks to Dr Aers, Moen, FloppyPhoenix, and other people who I can't remember for crit.

This is for DoomCon2018, for TEAM BIRD BEST TEAM!

Edit: The first progress bar thing may not render right on mobile. No real solution for this, as far as I know

Edit: I'd like to bring attention to a Spanish translation by morhadow

god is dead and birds killed him

I have nothing else to say. +1

reducing their Cognitohazardous Resistance Score to 1.0 x 10-17

Okay, that is an absurdly precise scale. Why would they ever need to know someone's cognitohazardous resistance to within 0.00000000000000001 points? Is there any practical difference between that and zero?

anyway, +1

I am retiring. However, in reality, I will continue to perform my duties for the Foundation.

Surely if you're writing to the 05-council, you have to say "I would like to" rather than "I will"?

Upvoting even though most of the Ethics Committee stuff didn't click for me because I really liked the way of describing anomalies in the final addendum and the overall concept is pretty cool. Not sure what "ʜөȅễẽөĺթ" means though… Is this just a weird way of writing 'help'?

The Ethics Committee logs sealed the deal for me on this one. I'm always a sucker for Ethics Committee narratives. Also, that vote percentage module is dope.

I really enjoyed this. +1.

just, one thing I need to ask,

1.0 x 10^-3

wouldn't just 10^-3 fit better?

For a long article, this managed to keep my interest through and through. The use of crosslinks here, while not always necessary, really helped establish the oddity that this article sets itself in and how the Foundation deals with the situation. The 3909 crosslink, in particular, threw me for such a loop. I'm glad that existed so I could set my expectations accordingly for the rest of the skip.

My one complaint is the Ethics Committee vote bit. I think it looks really ridiculous and weirdly ugly. I hope you're able to find a more pleasing alternative to it, even though I understand it's a pretty good way to represent what you wanted to do. I don't have too much of an issue with that being applied in the Project Status section (though it still looks odd there), but the way it's done in the EthCom bit is not good.

EDIT: Also, nice touch on the revision numbers. I think that works way better on here than the other usages of it for your series.