
this is pretty cool. i really like the idea of….
what was i talking about?
this is pretty cool. i really like the idea of….
what was i talking about?
Remember? You were about to say you liked… wait I'm not really sure…
Edit: my apologies for replying to a 4 year old post. I just don't even check the age of the most recent comment on such a good page.
Edit: well I just realized (after observing on another thread that new posts are added to the bottom of the last page) that I replied to the OLDEST post on this thread. Oops…
Well, ironically enough, you're replying to a 3 year old post by a user who both hasn't been active since 2013 AND who edited an apology in their post.
Only nerds have signatures
yeah i hate when people bump old threads. even if they are only a couple months old.
Okay, calling a stop to this line of conversation since it's starting to become spammy. One ironic facetious comment about bumping old comments is more than enough; four is excessive and the joke is past stale.
Obligatory reminder that spam is not allowed, and the repeated joke about bumping old comments is very stale now.
One of the things that I ADORE about SCP-055 is that it inspired SCP-3125 & the entire anti-memetic site. Anti-memes are *so cool.*
Okie, I stop talking about things that nobody care about now ^^;
You know, it was the…um…
Does it even exist anymore? I thought…What the hell am I talking about?
Well, we know it's not…um…
What was I going to say
Wow! This is easily one of the best! I can't believe I didn't read this one until now.
I found the SCP Wiki, and read this one in particular first, from reading the comments on http://qntm.org/?halfway
Love this one
I vote in favor of this, for the lulz.
Piffy is an SCP Foundation Moderator, Lv. 9001 Squishy Wizard, and Knight of the Red Pen.
There's already an entry for SCP-404. You'd have to renumber that one as well.
Neither have any relevant backlinks, a switcheroo between the two would be feasible.
The current SCP-404 is, while interesting in theory, executed in what I feel to be a rather tasteless (not to mention uninteresting) manner. It is this siege weapon's humble opinion that the "Manila Envelope" SCP could be deleted outright, and no one would miss it.
~EDIT~
I fail at typing.
Piffy is an SCP Foundation Moderator, Lv. 9001 Squishy Wizard, and Knight of the Red Pen.
How about we simply name it SCP-404-J?
It worked with SCP-173-J, SCP-999-J, and SCP-666-J, so why can't this one
How about we simply name it SCP-404-J?
It worked with SCP-173-J, SCP-999-J, and SCP-666-J, so why can't this one
Do you have ANY idea how old this is?
Pointless.
Because that is not a good reason to relocate a famous and super-highly-rated SCP, particularly to the joke list.
I would not want to see this article treated as a joke, and I'm sure many others would feel the same way.
if your reading this your gay
It isn't a friggin' -J, and the joke is less funny now that it's 2013 and not 2009.
For what it's worth, I concur in the statement that re-numbering to 404 would be *hilarious*. :)
Goddamn what a necro-reply. There's no way the numbers are gonna be switched now for such a corny little joke, anyway.
Also, happy +200 to 055!
About the addendum: But wouldn't the fact that it's an anti-meme, in fact, be one of those "negations of fact" thingies, since SCP-055 is most definitely not a meme…. we think.
I propose that we hereby begin to refer to this SCP as "the SCP that is not SCP-055".
Piffy is an SCP Foundation Moderator, Lv. 9001 Squishy Wizard, and Knight of the Red Pen.
This is quite worrysome… but I don't remember why, just that it wasn't something with good implications
*grin*
Piffy is an SCP Foundation Moderator, Lv. 9001 Squishy Wizard, and Knight of the Red Pen.
Wow… I forgot this existed. Not even joking. And I find that I even posted a comment on it that I forgot. Holie shit
Except part of you will remember it IS SCP-055, in which case you'll forget about it completely.
Wait, what? What SCP isn't SCP-055? Do we even have an 055?
I did not hate this article before, but I am positive that I do not hate it after the addendum that was not bad about not necessarily forgetting what the object is not was not… necessarily… what was I saying?