SCP Foundation

Definitely good enough for an upvote, in my opinion, but the dialogue feels a bit cheesy.

As Bryx said the dialogue is stilted and not very realistic-sounding, but I quite like the rest of the piece. Reminds me a lot of something out of Psychonauts, in a very good way.

I'm kind of split on this. It's a good article and all but I think the fact that you took the whole 'physical manifestation of a nightmare' and went with a feelsy article left me feeling just a tad disappointed at the end. +1 nonetheless, can't always have everything my way I suppose.

As said by the posters above me, this is a very interesting SCP but with a slightly cheesy story tackled on.

I like the story, small error here tho:

Doctor ██████: What else do know you know about this place?

I like the concept, and I like the beggining. But, as stated above, the dialogue feels robotic and awkward, and I feel like the end took a direction that doesn't really fit the article.

Upvoted for the interview, being a decent dream-related skip, and continuing from 1498, which I did not expect to ever have a continuation.

That said, there are numerous spots where the writing needs some brushing up. Though I don't consider the interview one of them; it occurred to me that the Doctor isn't talking to a little boy, but something else, so why wouldn't it talk like that, really?

Others have already pointed out the same issues with minor errors in the article that I would cite. I'm fine with the tone though, personally; I didn't get any weird feelings from it.
Has good clarity, isn't too long/short, holds attention to the end.
All in all, I say that although the wordage issues do need fixed, it's not enough to prevent me from just going ahead and upvoting it now. +1.

REM sleep, where dreams occur, happens several times during a full night's sleep. Might want to reduce the duration of the Alpha event and add something about selection of dream based on subconscious reaction or brainwave activity.

I want to hug J. Not sure why.